Skip to content

GHG Protocol September 2025 Update: Three Key Implications of Scope 2 Revisions for Corporate Electricity Accounting

The GHG Protocol has announced a revision to Scope 2 guidance, introducing 'hourly matching' and 'deliverability' principles. Future corporate electricity emission calculations will be more rigorous and transparent. This article analyzes the key impacts of this global electricity accounting transformation from three perspectives: revision background, major differences, and response strategies.

Scope 2_Blog 1_Figure

What Triggered the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Revision?

In September 2025, the GHG Protocol officially announced the launch of a 60-day public consultation in October to comprehensively revise Scope 2 (also known as "Category 2") guidance. This is the first major revision since the 2015 version was published, primarily focusing on indirect emissions from corporate electricity use (especially purchased electricity and renewable energy certificates). It is expected to redefine the selection logic and time scales for "electricity emission factors," enabling companies to better reflect actual grid operations when disclosing electricity-related emissions. Another objective is to address international demands for greater transparency in carbon inventory data.

Root Cause: The Global "Green Electricity" Credibility Crisis

Over the past decade, most companies have claimed reduced Scope 2 emissions by purchasing Renewable Energy Certificates (RECs) or signing long-term Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs). However, this "annual settlement system" has gradually raised concerns:

  • Was the renewable energy represented by certificates actually generated during the company's electricity consumption period?
  • Is the certificate's generation location on the same grid as the company's actual electricity consumption area?
  • Are annual average emission factors too crude, masking high-emission phenomena during peak periods?

These issues have challenged the "true carbon reduction value of green electricity."

The EU CSRD, IFRS S2, and US SEC sustainability disclosure regulations are progressively requiring companies to provide higher-resolution energy information. Consequently, the GHG Protocol has initiated this revision, hoping to establish a globally applicable standard that reflects electricity's real-time nature.

Revision Phases and Future Timeline

The current version is still in the "draft public consultation" phase. After the consultation period ends, feedback will be compiled, with final publication expected in the second half of 2027. Officials have also announced a "phased implementation" approach:

  • Step 1: Pilot hourly emission estimation at company and data provider levels
  • Step 2: Promote updates to electricity certificate and emission factor databases
  • Step 3: Full adoption of new standards for disclosure and verification

For companies, this means the next 1-2 years represent a critical transition period for adjusting their inventory practices.

II. What Are the Key Differences Between Old and New Versions?

From "Annual Average" to "Hourly Reality"

The new Scope 2 emphasizes the "hourly matching" concept, requiring companies to calculate electricity emissions using higher temporal resolution emission factors and confirm that green electricity aligns with actual consumption timing. This means:

  • Annual average emission factors can no longer simplify calculations
  • Renewable energy carbon reduction must occur in the "same time period"
  • Companies need continuous monitoring and recording capabilities

In the future, Scope 2 electricity activity data calculations may change from:

Annual electricity consumption (kWh) × National electricity emission factor

To:

Hourly emission calculation formula

Where kWh_t is electricity consumption in hour t, and EF_t is the emission factor for that period.

From "Certificate Purchase" to "Actual Deliverability"

The new version introduces the "Deliverability" principle, stipulating that companies can only claim renewable energy electricity from the same grid that can be actually transmitted. Additionally, the new system advocates prioritizing "consumption-side" data to ensure emission calculations reflect actual responsibility locations.

If companies purchase green electricity across regions or internationally, they need to re-examine whether RECs and PPA contracts meet regional matching requirements. Green electricity strategies will place greater emphasis on geographic and physical feasibility.

From "Immediate Requirements" to "Gradual Implementation"

Considering the varying data capabilities across industries and company sizes, the new version will adopt phased implementation and provide exemptions for SMEs:

  • Initially, "load curves (variations in electricity consumption at different times)" or seasonal factors can be used for estimation
  • Existing contracts can still be used during the transition period but must disclose their limitations

III. Future Approach: How Can Companies Prepare in Advance?

The new Scope 2 will bring both regulatory and technical changes. Companies that position themselves early during the transition period can not only reduce compliance risks but also strengthen their sustainability competitiveness.

Establish Electricity Data Foundations

  • Confirm early whether your electricity supplier can provide hourly or regional emission factors
  • If only annual or monthly data is currently available, consider supplementing with "time-based monitoring" or "smart meters"
  • Inventory internal energy-consuming equipment data to confirm which facilities or systems can export consumption time records

The key to "hourly emissions" lies in "data continuity." Even if still using annual factors, you should begin establishing data retention systems for rapid future conversion.

Re-examine Green Electricity Strategies

  • Check whether existing RECs, PPAs, or green electricity programs are located in the same grid region
  • When signing new contracts, include "hourly supply" or "regional matching" clauses
  • If green electricity suppliers are far from consumption points, consider alternatives like "regional electricity intermediary platforms" or "local green energy project investments"

The Supporting Value of Digitalization and Automation

As Scope 2 calculations move toward hourly data, data granularity is increasing, making manual inventory increasingly impractical. Implementing carbon inventory or energy management systems helps:

  • Automatically integrate electricity supply data to quickly calculate emissions for different periods
  • Synchronize with international standard updates on electricity emission factors
  • Provide real-time visual reports supporting internal decisions and verification needs

The focus of digitalization is not just time-saving but building "traceable" and "verifiable" data chains. As GHG Protocol, IFRS S2, and CSRD regulations gradually integrate, this will become the foundational capability for companies to pass verification and investment ratings.

When it comes to digitalized systems for calculating carbon emission data, you definitely shouldn't miss Sustaihub's DCarbon Cloud Carbon System ✨! This system can help you cover most inventory needs, significantly reduce administrative burdens, and effectively improve reporting efficiency to confidently meet various environmental agency requirements.

Carbon inventory doesn't have to start from scratch. Combined with appropriate digital tools, you can truly stand undefeated in the carbon management era!

Want to learn how to use the DCarbon system? ➜ Try the inventory platform for free now!

References

Upcoming Scope 2 Public Consultation: Overview of Revisions., Greenhouse Gas Protocol, 2025/09/29

Want to learn more about sustainability report preparation?

Book a free consultation. Our professional consultants will plan the best solution for you.

Related Articles

上課實況

Dec 03, 2025

Food & Beverage ESG Promotion Association Partners with Sustaihub: Building Practical ISO 14064 Carbon Inventory Skills to Help Food Industry Create Their Own Inventory from Scratch

As consumers pay more attention to "green dining" and supply chains impose stricter ESG requirements, "sustainability" is no longer just an attractive slogan—it has become a survival issue that the food and beverage industry must face. However, on the road to transformation, working together is better than going it alone. This time, the Food & Beverage ESG Promotion Association (hereinafter referred to as "the Association") partnered with Sustaihub to transform this belief into concrete "data" and "competitiveness." On November 20 and 27, 2025, they invited professional instructors to conduct two ISO 14064-1 carbon inventory practical training sessions for Association members. This was not just a lecture, but a crucial step in helping SMEs in the food industry move from "wanting to do it" to "knowing how to do it," while fulfilling the Association's founding mission: "Every food and beverage brand can create long-term value for the environment, society, and business through sustainable actions."
1

Nov 26, 2025

How to Approach ESG Disclosure: Common Enterprise Challenges + Complete Digital Tool Guide

Learn ESG disclosure best practices from real consulting experience, and discover how digital tools can dramatically improve efficiency!
ESG、CSR差異3

Nov 22, 2024

COP29 Insights: How Carbon Inventory Transforms from Compliance to Competitive Advantage

Against the backdrop of global decarbonization trends and rapid development of international carbon markets, carbon inventory has long transcended being merely a compliance requirement—it has become a critical task determining an enterprise's future competitiveness. Accurate data, transparent management, and efficient solutions will be the core weapons for enterprises to stand out in the carbon market.
永訊智庫_新增500家企業列強制碳盤查

Jan 10, 2025

500 Additional Companies Subject to Mandatory Carbon Inventory with 2030 Emission Reduction Target Up to 30%

Taiwan's new 2030 emission reduction target is a 28% reduction plus or minus 2 percentage points compared to the baseline year 2005, while also expanding the scope of mandatory carbon inventory registration.
CBAM

Mar 13, 2025

What is CBAM? CBAM Postponed to 2027: Impact on Taiwanese Enterprises

EU CBAM delayed to 2027, how should Taiwanese enterprises respond? This article analyzes the CBAM mechanism, affected industries, and response strategies to help businesses grasp future carbon trading trends.